Showing posts with label Early Resolution Meeting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Early Resolution Meeting. Show all posts

Friday, August 26, 2016

Ontario Power Prices Are Too High! 

My service provider is Enersource Hydro (now Alectra Utilities) Mississauga and I just received my latest electricity bill covering the period June 12th through August 13th 2016. I had to go back 24 previous bills (August 2012) to find one this high! No doubt the hotter than normal summer temperatures were a contributing factor; we were guilty of using 6.8% more electricity in this billing period than the same period in 2015. However the main reason is our average cost per kWh was 20% higher than last year. Ouch!

This aroused my curiosity; what exactly is the cost for electricity in Ontario? So I opened up my files and took a closer look at our billing cost, consumption, and the average unit price we paid for electricity going back to October 2002. [I keep close track of utility bills as part of my home office costs so the information was close at hand].

Price

To make things easy I simply took the dollar cost for each billing period and divided it by the electricity consumed to determine my average unit price. This makes the most sense to me because it equates what I pay to exactly what I use. I then totaled annual cost and consumption based on an August through June cycle. Here is what I found...

Chart 1: Power Prices are Increasing

Since 2003 our average unit price has risen from $0.090/kWh to $0.169/kWh. This is an increase of 87.8% over the last 13 years or a 6.75% per year average growth rate. In comparison the Canadian Consumer Price Index during roughly the same period of time has climbed a more modest 29.1% or 2.24% per year.

More bad news - in recent years the price increase has accelerated. Since August 2013 my average price has increased by 31% or 10.3% per year - with no apparent end in sight. [My last two bills for the 2016 year had average rates of $0.172/kWh and $0.182/kWh].

Consumption



Chart 2:Consuming Less is No Longer Reducing My Bills







































































































































































External factors like temperature and humidity do impact the consumption of power but it is fairly obvious from Chart 2 that in recent years we have found ways to reduce our electricity use. To illustrate this point our average annual consumption from 2003 through 2012 was 20,230 kWh with a peak consumption of 21,263 kWh in 2010. Since then we have had six years of declines. Our 2016 usage was 12,398 kWh - the lowest level since we have been in our house; (8,865) kWh  or (41.7)% lower than the 2010 peak and (38.7)% lower than the 2003 to 2012 average.

Billing Cost

Our annual cost of electricity since 2003 has averaged $2,183 with a peak cost of $2,597 in 2011. Since 2011 our annual cost has fallen. By 2015 we were paying $(701) or (27)% less than 2011 and essentially the same amount as in 2003! This was accomplished by a significant reduction in consumption that more than made up for the price increases. Our 2016 cost was  $205 or 10.8% higher than 2015 and a chilling reminder of what happens when consumption doesn't fall anymore.

Long Term Price Impact

Using the Ontario Energy Board Monthly Bill Estimator I took my 2003 consumption and divided it equally into six to simulate an average bi-monthly bill. I picked my utility from the drop down box (Enersource Hydro Mississauga). I have Time of Use (TOU) billing and for this exercise I left the splits for off-peak, mid-peak and peak usage at the provincial average of 65%, 17% and 18% respectively. Popping in consumption of 3,486 kWh my estimated bi-monthly bill would have been $598.49 or $3,590.94 annually. If we had done nothing our power bill in 2016 would have resulted in a 91% increase in annual costs (assuming today's prices, normal TOU consumption patterns and our 2003 consumption).  

TOU Consumption

Part of the efforts we have made to manage our electricity costs is to consciously try to defer usage to off-peak hours; 7 pm to 7 am on business days and anytime on weekends and holidays. In that regard we pay less than the average provincial consumer using the same quantity of electricity as our split for 2016 averaged 73% off-peak, 14% mid-peak and 14% peak. The TOU savings for us amounted to about $66 annually and our electricity bill as a result is (3.1)% lower than it otherwise would have been.

Mike Says ...

Since 2003 power prices have risen by almost 90% and our consumption is down almost 40% leaving us with a reasonable increase in our electricity cost.  

It has not been easy reducing our power consumption and shifting demand to lower cost time periods. We have incurred other costs; investment in new energy efficient devices, and changes in our energy usage habits including a willingness to forgo consumption (i.e. turn up the thermostat on our AC) to reduce costs.  

But after five years and a very hot summer we are tiring of this never-ending battle. Now that our consumption has stopped declining we could be facing significant increases in future power costs. It is one thing to reduce consumption to save money and something totally different to reduce consumption to minimize cost increases. In the latter case you are getting ahead and in the former barely staying afloat.

If the real reason for rising prices is to contract for more expensive new generation should there not be incrementally higher price points for excessive consumption? As brother Mike correctly points out the Ontario power system penalizes the poor but does nothing to curtail the rich from using as much power as they want. In fact as you consume less energy your average unit cost actually increases due to the nature of the charges; some are fixed, some are variable. [For the fixed portion the less consumed the higher the impact of the fixed charges].

I support using electricity more efficiently but enough is enough! We need to better understand how to reduce consumption without dramatically reducing our standard of living.  Prices are out of control and many folks are feeling the pain.    












Sunday, March 1, 2015

My Experience with an Early Resolution Meeting for a Traffic Ticket

Have you ever been ticketed for a traffic violation, felt you were innocent and wondered what to do?

Last July I received a ticket for an improper left turn on a multi-lane highway. I was turning onto Cawthra Road from the Queensway in Mississauga. There was a car in front of me and the light was red when I got to the intersection. On the advance green the car in front started to move through he intersection and I was right behind. About 400 feet past the intersection was a police officer in an unmarked cruiser. He waved the car in front to pull over and then he waved me to pull over as well.

I didn't really get an explanation as to what I did wrong and I left with an $85 ticket plus the potential for 2 demerit points for the offense. When reviewing my options I noticed that I had three: plead guilty and pay the fine, go to court and fight the charge, or request an early resolution meeting with the prosecutor. I decided that a meeting would be my best choice as I retained the right to go to court.  After choosing this option I received a notice in September that the meeting was scheduled to take place at the end of February.

In the interim I stewed about the charge and carefully reviewed what I did during the turn. I went back to the intersection and took shots with my camera. I went on line and used Google Maps to get an overview of the intersection and I had ground level photos that clearly showed that there were no lane markings and that the lane markings immediately past the intersection had been worn out and were not visible; a key part of my defense.  By the time February rolled around I was ready.

I get to the courthouse 20 minutes early and asked for directions. I was shepherded to a courtroom where about fifteen other people were already seated. There was a line that I joined that snaked up the aisle. At the head of the line was a lady that I assume was the prosecutor; pure speculation because we were never introduced.When it was my turn I handed my sheet to the lady.

She noted the charge on my ticket, the fine and demerit points. She then indicated that she could reduce the charge to a violation of a Mississauga by-law rather than an offense under the Highway Traffic Act. This reduced charge was $65 and no demerit points. The alternative was to go to court and if convicted pay the full fine plus court costs and have the demerit points put on my driving record. This would be my long awaited "meeting"; arguing my case was never on the table. In the brief time I had to make a decision, I rationalized that at $65 the plea bargain was less risky and time intensive so probably the smartest move under the circumstances - so I took the deal. 
    
I was just starting to feel relieved and good about my decision when I was told I would have to sit down and wait for the justice of the peace to come in so "the deal" could be blessed by the court. About 20 minutes later I got up, pleaded guilty to the reduced charge, acknowledged that I could pay the ticket immediately and was handed a slip to take with me. I guess if I couldn't pay right away I would have been given time; thirty days seemed to be the norm although I probably could have gotten even longer to pay if I needed it.

So upstairs I went with the slip in hand looking for a cashier to pay. A line had formed and while there were five cashier positions available, only three were staffed and two were taking customers.  As I waited I had a chance to read the slip in my hand - there was an extra $5 tacked on to the ticket for fees and that there was a Victim Fine Surcharge (VFS) added to the ticket as well. The VFS is a graduated "tax" that increases with the size of the fine. In my case it amounted to $15. It was then it dawned on me - I would be paying the same $85 as the original ticket instead of the $65 I thought I had agreed to; some deal!

Mike Says ... The Early Resolution Meeting was like an episode of Let's Make a Deal. Virtually everyone in the room was offered a plea bargain that was better than their original ticket. As far as I could tell everyone accepted the offer, including me. It made me feel a little cheap to accept it when I still thought I was innocent. However after weighing the cost and time to go to court against the likelihood of winning the plea bargain seemed reasonable.  Of course after I found out about the hidden fees I felt stupid as well as cheap for falling for "a deal" where there really wasn't one to begin with.


If you are looking for an opportunity to plead your case - it is not going to happen based on my experience with the Early Resolution Meeting (ERM). There was a measure of satisfaction in delaying the payment of the fine for seven months. I also avoided having those two demerit points on my driving record. For some that would be enough of a reason to go this route before pleading guilty and avoiding a court case. I am not sure if I would ever go this route again. I don't make a habit of getting tickets but if I did I might have to reconsider my point of view; demerit points impact on insurance rates and that cost could be a lot larger than a ticket.